[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [RRG] NAT-PT and other approaches to IPv6 adoption - Dual Stack Lite
- To: HeinerHummel@aol.com
- Subject: Re: [RRG] NAT-PT and other approaches to IPv6 adoption - Dual Stack Lite
- From: Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
- Date: Sat, 02 Aug 2008 18:47:34 +1200
- Cc: rw@firstpr.com.au, drc@virtualized.org, rrg@psg.com
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:organization:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc :subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; b=g2A+k/jBIWAGBnanZjoh2PwUHdfPrf+JmCOMlAOSK5VUWrR/vgeC412Ub2r3lTsk3F TjpVdcpRW7uiuT2EGi1PE2KEJoFJEba3QEIYzdmpnU5OSDVBigAiEND2kk+JvCQDCETT rmeaS2YvO+cH1giBv6I1x+2g0lRPyUnRPBZRg=
- In-reply-to: <bc4.2c002472.35c455f9@aol.com>
- Organization: University of Auckland
- References: <bc4.2c002472.35c455f9@aol.com>
- User-agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.6 (Windows/20070728)
> I don't know how to call that tiny spot which could be identified by using
> 128 bits.
That's not, and never has been, anything to do with the choice of 128 bits.
There's been garbage marketing of IPv6 along those lines for many years,
of course. "2^128 will be definitely adequate as it is comparable to the
number of particles in the universe. " etc etc.
Brian
--
to unsubscribe send a message to rrg-request@psg.com with the
word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body.
archive: <http://psg.com/lists/rrg/> & ftp://psg.com/pub/lists/rrg