[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [RRG] Long term clean-slate only for the RRG?
Dino,
Like I said, it has been a while since I looked at it. I'd have to go
through it again and refresh my memory. Perhaps I can find some time in the
near future to do that, right now, I've unfortunately got too much else
happening.
jak
----- Original Message -----
From: "Dino Farinacci" <dino@cisco.com>
To: "James Kempf" <kempf@docomolabs-usa.com>
Cc: "Robin Whittle" <rw@firstpr.com.au>; "Routing Research Group"
<rrg@psg.com>; <tony.li@tony.li>; "Lixia Zhang" <lixia@cs.ucla.edu>
Sent: Monday, June 23, 2008 3:35 PM
Subject: Re: [RRG] Long term clean-slate only for the RRG?
One thing that concerns me is the managability of any map and encap
solution. I took a look at the LISP proposal a while back, and it struck
me as raising some unique challenges for managability. That's not a
reason not to do it, but I think that the RG should focus on "design for
managability", i.e. that managability should be in the top ten goals for
the design.
Thanks for your comments James. What sort of challenges are you referring
to? Could you be more specific?
Dino
--
to unsubscribe send a message to rrg-request@psg.com with the
word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body.
archive: <http://psg.com/lists/rrg/> & ftp://psg.com/pub/lists/rrg