[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [RRG] Re: We can't bet the Internet on the imminent adoption of IPv6

I agree with Brian here. Lets stop this thread, and focus on our task of a scalable routing architecture. 

Lixia

On May 27, 2008, at 7:52 PM, Brian E Carpenter wrote:


Who said we were making such a bet?

On 2008-05-28 13:35, Robin Whittle wrote:

Short version:

 We should agree that the RRG solution needs to work for both
 IPv4 and IPv6.


Who is disagreeing with that statement?

But we shouldn't, IMHO, waste RRG time on analysing IPv6 deployment
issues. That discussion is ongoing, elsewhere.

   Brian

--
to unsubscribe send a message to rrg-request@psg.com with the
word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body.
archive: <http://psg.com/lists/rrg/> & ftp://psg.com/pub/lists/rrg



--
to unsubscribe send a message to rrg-request@psg.com with the
word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body.
archive: <http://psg.com/lists/rrg/> & ftp://psg.com/pub/lists/rrg