[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: "Doing It Right" (was Re: [RRG] Consensus? IPv4 scaling problem ...)

To: Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: "Doing It Right" (was Re: [RRG] Consensus? IPv4 scaling problem ...)
From: David Conrad <drc@virtualized.org>
Date: Tue, 27 May 2008 15:04:54 -0700
Cc: Routing Research Group <rrg@psg.com>
In-reply-to: <483C82B1.90605@gmail.com>
References: <483934A7.90800@firstpr.com.au> <8329C86009B2F24493D76B486146769A9DDC072E@USEXCHANGE.corp.extremenetworks.com> <48397AB9.1020501@firstpr.com.au>,<483A1A83.4080208@gmail.com> <8329C86009B2F24493D76B486146769A9DDC073F@USEXCHANGE.corp.extremenetworks.com> <754A8DE4E3F64660BD83CEFCBE007FE1@ad.redback.com> <3525C9833C09ED418C6FD6CD9514668C03EC0237@emailwf1.jnpr.net> <DD4088F4-53EF-476D-8ED7-C51312261761@virtualized.org> <474EEBD229DF754FB83D256004D0210805DF96E3@XCH-NW-6V1.nw.nos.boeing.com> <CBAD07AA-D216-4D56-AEAA-84D10DF1D540@virtualized.org> <483C82B1.90605@gmail.com>

On May 27, 2008, at 2:52 PM, Brian E Carpenter wrote:

But is this really an RRG issue?

No it's not. The question I was trying to ask was what are the baseassumption as to what is feasible and what isn't if we going to "Do ItRight" as Ross suggests we do.


Regards,
-drc


--
to unsubscribe send a message to rrg-request@psg.com with the
word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body.
archive: <http://psg.com/lists/rrg/> & ftp://psg.com/pub/lists/rrg

References:
- [RRG] Consensus? IPv4 scaling problem must be solved directly, not by relying on migration to IPv6
  - From: Robin Whittle <rw@firstpr.com.au>
- RE: [RRG] Consensus? IPv4 scaling problem must be solved directly, not by relying on migration to IPv6
  - From: Randall Atkinson <rja@extremenetworks.com>
- Re: [RRG] Consensus? IPv4 scaling problem must be solved directly, not by relying on migration to IPv6
  - From: Robin Whittle <rw@firstpr.com.au>
- Re: [RRG] Consensus? IPv4 scaling problem must be solved directly, not by relying on migration to IPv6
  - From: Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
- RE: [RRG] Consensus? IPv4 scaling problem must be solved directly, not by relying on migration to IPv6
  - From: Randall Atkinson <rja@extremenetworks.com>
- RE: [RRG] Consensus? IPv4 scaling problem must be solved directly, not by relying on migration to IPv6
  - From: "Tony Li" <tony.li@tony.li>
- RE: [RRG] Consensus? IPv4 scaling problem must be solved directly, not by relying on migration to IPv6
  - From: "Ross Callon" <rcallon@juniper.net>
- "Doing It Right" (was Re: [RRG] Consensus? IPv4 scaling problem ...)
  - From: David Conrad <drc@virtualized.org>
- RE: "Doing It Right" (was Re: [RRG] Consensus? IPv4 scaling problem ...)
  - From: "Fleischman, Eric" <eric.fleischman@boeing.com>
- Re: "Doing It Right" (was Re: [RRG] Consensus? IPv4 scaling problem ...)
  - From: David Conrad <drc@virtualized.org>
- Re: "Doing It Right" (was Re: [RRG] Consensus? IPv4 scaling problem ...)
  - From: Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>

Prev by Date: Re: "Doing It Right" (was Re: [RRG] Consensus? IPv4 scaling problem ...)
Next by Date: Re: [RRG] Consensus? End-user networks need their own portable address space
Previous by thread: Re: "Doing It Right" (was Re: [RRG] Consensus? IPv4 scaling problem ...)
Next by thread: Re: "Doing It Right" (was Re: [RRG] Consensus? IPv4 scaling problem ...)
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread