[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [RRG] Mobility frequency

To: Randall Atkinson <rja@extremenetworks.com>
Subject: Re: [RRG] Mobility frequency
From: Eliot Lear <lear@cisco.com>
Date: Thu, 21 Feb 2008 14:53:19 +0100
Cc: Routing Research Group <rrg@psg.com>
In-reply-to: <8329C86009B2F24493D76B486146769A980E2D4B@USEXCHANGE.corp.extremenetworks.com>
References: <8329C86009B2F24493D76B486146769A980E2D4B@USEXCHANGE.corp.extremenetworks.com>
User-agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.9 (Macintosh/20071031)

Ran,

I didn't quite follow your conclusion.  Here is my own:

Future L3 solutions may provide the user with other options, but NATO'sdecisions seem prudent given the state of the art today.


A related thought:

The MIP and MIPv6 people developed their solutions based on a certainset of assumptions. taking into account any number of corner cases, aswell as the general case. What could another mobility solution offer /fix that MIP/MIPv6 didn't?


Regards,

Eliot


--
to unsubscribe send a message to rrg-request@psg.com with the
word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body.
archive: <http://psg.com/lists/rrg/> & ftp://psg.com/pub/lists/rrg

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [RRG] Mobility frequency
  - From: Robin Whittle <rw@firstpr.com.au>
- RE: [RRG] Mobility frequency
  - From: Randall Atkinson <rja@extremenetworks.com>

References:
- [RRG] Mobility frequency
  - From: Randall Atkinson <rja@extremenetworks.com>

Prev by Date: [RRG] Mobility frequency
Next by Date: RE: [RRG] Are host-stack modifications allowed or disallowed ?
Previous by thread: [RRG] Mobility frequency
Next by thread: RE: [RRG] Mobility frequency
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread