[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: AD review of draft-ietf-rap-feedback-fr-pib-04.txt

To: bwijnen@lucent.com
Subject: Re: AD review of draft-ietf-rap-feedback-fr-pib-04.txt
From: Juergen Schoenwaelder <schoenw@ibr.cs.tu-bs.de>
Date: Thu, 19 Dec 2002 17:49:46 +0100
Cc: rap@ops.ietf.org
In-reply-to: <7D5D48D2CAA3D84C813F5B154F43B15583CF1C@nl0006exch001u.nl.lucent.com>(bwijnen@lucent.com)
References: <7D5D48D2CAA3D84C813F5B154F43B15583CF1C@nl0006exch001u.nl.lucent.com>

>>>>> Wijnen, Bert (Bert) writes:

Bert> Current real concerns: - Section 3.2 start off with new text
Bert> stating that SNMP Counter32 and Counter64 are not supported by
Bert> SPPI. What is this based on?  I do not understand that statement
Bert> at all.

RFC 3159 sections 7.1.1 and 7.1.5 I would say.

/js

-- 
Juergen Schoenwaelder    <http://www.informatik.uni-osnabrueck.de/schoenw/>

References:
- RE: AD review of draft-ietf-rap-feedback-fr-pib-04.txt
  - From: "Wijnen, Bert (Bert)" <bwijnen@lucent.com>

Prev by Date: RE: AD-review of draft-ietf-rap-feedback-frwk-03.txt
Next by Date: RE: AD review of draft-ietf-rap-feedback-fr-pib-04.txt
Previous by thread: RE: AD review of draft-ietf-rap-feedback-fr-pib-04.txt
Next by thread: RE: AD review of draft-ietf-rap-feedback-fr-pib-04.txt
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread