Re: Response Request: COPS PIBs standardization due-diligence feedback

[Kwok Ho Chan <khchan@NortelNetworks.com>]

frwkIpFilterSrcPrefixLength (and also frwkIpFilterDstPrefixLength)
works
the same way as how IP Address Ranges are specified today using
CIDR.
Please reference RFC 1519 for more details on CIDR.
-- Kwok --

At 09:52 AM 2/1/02 +0530, Krishna Prasad Akkineni wrote:
> Hi, 
>     This frwkIpFilterSrcPrefixLength got added from 
> draft-ietf-rap-frameworkpib-06.txt. 
> It looks like IP range representation can be made using this. But I do
> not know how exactly? 
> Could any one please explain more about
> frwkIpFilterSrcPrefixLength 
> Regards 
> kp 
>   
>
> Muralidhar S wrote: 
> > Krishna Prasad, 
> >
> > The  "FrwkIpFilterEntry" in 
> > "draft-ietf-rap-frameworkpib-06.txt" defines an 
> > attribute 
> > "frwkIpFilterSrcPrefixLength". There is one for destination
> > address also. 
> > Can we make 
> > use of this to define the range of IpAddress??. 
> >
> > Regards 
> > murali 
> >
> > -----Original Message----- 
> > From: Krishna Prasad Akkineni
> > [mailto:krishna.akkineni@wipro.com]
> > Sent: 2002. January 29. 13:31 
> > To: rap@ops.ietf.org 
> > Cc: scott.hahn@intel.com 
> > Subject: [Fwd: Re: Response Request: COPS PIBs standardization
> > due-diligence 
> > feedback] 
> >
> > Hi, 
> >     I would like to construct a policy for which the
> > condition attribute is 
> > a range of IP addresses. 
> > e.g., 192.168.143.100 to 192.168.143.157. How can we represent this in
> > PIB. 
> > Regards 
> > Krishna Prasad.A 
> >  
>
>   
>