[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: Charter questions
- To: "Durham, David" <david.durham@intel.com>
- Subject: RE: Charter questions
- From: Bernard Aboba <aboba@internaut.com>
- Date: Tue, 22 Jan 2002 14:51:14 -0800 (PST)
- Cc: "Weiss, Walter" <wweiss@Ellacoya.com>, "'Harrington, David'" <dbh@enterasys.com>, "'Wijnen, Bert (Bert)'" <bwijnen@lucent.com>, "'rap@ops.ietf.org'" <rap@ops.ietf.org>, "'Randy Bush'" <randy@psg.com>, "'David Mitton'" <david@mitton.com>
- In-reply-to: <10C8636AE359D4119118009027AE99870DA5DD4B@FMSMSX34>
> Also, I was unaware that the AAA WG was expanding its role to define
> additional QoS signaling protocols? I thought Mobile IP and NASReq were the
> target areas.
I don't think that Diameter is functioning as a signalling protocol here,
is it? Last time I looked, the QoS AVP was somewhat akin to the Filter
attribute, and had no dynamic capabilities.
The justification for putting this in was based on some of the
requirements in RFC 2989.