RE: WG Last Call for draft-ietf-rap-frameworkpib-06.txt concludes

["Kwok-Ho Chan" <khchan@nortelnetworks.com>]

To All:

Here is our (Ravi, Pedro and My) thinkings:
We would change the Framework PIB to:

frwkRoleComboEntry
    PIB-INDEX { frwkRoleComboPrid }
    UNIQUENESS {}
    ::= { frwkRoleComboTable 1 }
FrwkRoleComboEntry ::= SEQUENCE {
    frwkRoleComboPrid InstanceId,
    frwkRoleComboRoles RoleCombination,
    frwkRoleComboCapSetName SnmpAdminString
    }

frwkIfRoleComboEntry
    EXTENDS { frwkRoleComboEntry }
    UNIQUENESS { frwkIfRoleComboIfIndex,
                            frwkRoleComboCapSetName }
    ::= { frwkIfRoleComboTable 1 }
FrwkIfRoleComboEntry ::= SEQUENCE {
    frwkIfRoleComboIfIndex InterfaceIndex
    }

And, in the future, someone can define a new PRC, like:

frwkSlotRoleComboEntry
    EXTENDS { frwkRoleComboEntry }
    UNIQUENESS { frwkSlotRoleComboSlotNumber,
                         frwkRoleComboCapSetName }
    ::= { frwkSlotRoleComboTable 1 }
FrwkSlotRoleComboEntry ::= SEQUENCE {
    frwkSlotRoleComboSlotNumber Unsigned32
    }

We think this will solve the issues Pedro raised and will also allow the
DiffServ PIB to work correctly without any modification.

Please let us know if you have any comments, as the next version of the
draft will be going into IESG.

Thank you very much!
-- Ravi, Pedro, and Kwok --


At 11:43 AM 12/5/01 +0000, Da Silva, Pedro wrote:
>Ravi,
>
>Yes that sounds great, it goes towards the generic nature of the frwk PIB.
>
>Although I would expect to see the extended tables in the client type PIB
>and not in the frwk PIB.
>Unless, of course, there are different PIBs defs that need that construct
>(e.g. Feedback PIB) and so one could make a case for placing the table in
>the frwk PIB. And the frwkIfRoleCombo table certainly falls in that lot...so
>no worries.
>
>cheers,
>Pedro
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Sahita, Ravi [mailto:ravi.sahita@intel.com]
>Sent: Tuesday, December 04, 2001 7:22 PM
>To: 'Da Silva, Pedro'; rap@ops.ietf.org
>Subject: RE: WG Last Call for draft-ietf-rap-frameworkpib-06.txt
>concludes
>
>
>Pedro,
>
>Regarding the issues, like you proposed, we can
>define a base frwkRoleCombo table containing the
>basic RoleCombination and IfCapSetName attributes;
>and an extension (the frwkIfRoleCombo table) which
>contains the IfIndex, IfDirection attributes.
>
>This addresses both issues of having a base rolecombo
>table to form other extensions of and having the
>IfDirection in its extension the frwkIfRoleCombo table
>which allows different capability sets in different
>directions to be defined. Does that sound satisfactory?
>
>Ravi
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Da Silva, Pedro [mailto:pdasilva@orchestream.com]
>Sent: Monday, December 03, 2001 7:05 AM
>To: rap@ops.ietf.org
>Subject: RE: WG Last Call for draft-ietf-rap-frameworkpib-06.txt concludes
>
>
>Given that last call period is over I presume there was consensus on a few
>issues raised recently concerning the frwkIfRoleCombo table. Could you
>please provide the resolutions?
>
>The two messages where these issues were raised were:
>Sent: Friday, November 16, 2001 2:43 PM
>Subject: RE: frameworkpib-06 comments
>
>and
>Sent: Friday, November 23, 2001 11:23 AM
>Subject: frwkIfRoleComboTable
>
>cheers,
>Pedro
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Hahn, Scott [mailto:scott.hahn@intel.com]
>Sent: Sunday, December 02, 2001 6:41 AM
>To: rap@ops.ietf.org
>Cc: bwijnen@lucent.com; Mark L. Stevens
>Subject: WG Last Call for draft-ietf-rap-frameworkpib-06.txt concludes
>
>
>This WG last call for the Framework PIB document
>http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-rap-frameworkpib-06.txt
>has completed. We have had no dissenting comments on the mailing list and we
>intend to advance this document to the AD for review by the IESG.
>
>    Scott Hahn
>    Mark Stevens
>    WG co-chairs
>
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Hahn, Scott [mailto:scott.hahn@intel.com]
>Sent: Sunday, December 02, 2001 6:41 AM
>To: rap@ops.ietf.org
>Cc: bwijnen@lucent.com; Mark L. Stevens
>Subject: WG Last Call for draft-ietf-rap-frameworkpib-06.txt concludes
>
>
>This WG last call for the Framework PIB document
>http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-rap-frameworkpib-06.txt
>has completed. We have had no dissenting comments on the mailing list and we
>intend to advance this document to the AD for review by the IESG.
>
>    Scott Hahn
>    Mark Stevens
>    WG co-chairs