Re: COPS for UMTS

[Brian Williams <brian.williams@ericsson.com.au>]

Louis-Nicolas Hamer wrote:
> Bert,

<snip>

> But I think the general agreement is that COPS-PR may be used for 
> pre-provisioning of general policies
> 
> and something else is needed on a per flow basis for admission control.

3G.PP is only specifying COPS usage for an admission control function 
for service based control. It is not specifying COPS for any other 
provisioning, (vendors can use whatever provisioning tools they wish for 
IP services).
/brian

> 
>  
> 
> Hope this clarifies,
> 
> *Louis-Nicolas Hamer*                        
> 
>     -----Original Message-----
>     *From:* Wijnen, Bert (Bert) [mailto:bwijnen@lucent.com]
>     *Sent:* Monday, August 20, 2001 3:34 PM
>     *To:* Hamer, Louis-Nicolas [WDLN2:AN22:EXCH]; Jaseemuddin, Muhammad
>     [WDLN2:AN33:EXCH]; 'Salkintzis Apostolis-Y1026C'; rap@ops.ietf.org
>     *Subject:* RE: COPS for UMTS
> 
>     I have seen that document. From that, it is not clear to me if
> 
>     - Your are gonna do just COPS, which I think means no PIB
> 
>     - You are also gonna do COPS-PR, which I think means a PIB
> 
>      
> 
>     There is talk about using both RSVP and Diffserv for end-to-end QoS
> 
>     so when I see Diffserv, then I suspect COPS-PR, but that is not clear.
> 
>      
> 
>     Also... I thought that there was no final decision yet that COPS was
> 
>     going to be the interface... the doc has not yet been approved, has it?
> 
>     Sorry for not understanding the details of the process in 3GPP.
> 
>     Bert
>