[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Diffserv] PIB design
It's certainly intentional for the diffserv case, for many
obvious practical reasons. For the general case, that is a RAP
discussion only and diffserv has nothing to say.
Brian
Yacine El Mghazli wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> My question is quite simple, I guess some of you well know the diffserv PIB
> : Finally, since the lattest versions, it is very closed to the diffserv
> MIB.
> So, will all the future specific PIBs be so closed to their corresponding
> MIB ?
> If not, what motivated such a choice for diffserv ?
>
> Thanks,
> Yacine
>
> -- Yacine El Mghazli
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> Alcatel R&I
> Software and Services Strategic Program - VIPeR
> Marcoussis, France
> Tel +33 1 6963 4187
> Fax +33 1 6963 1169
> yacine.el_mghazli@ms.alcatel.fr
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> _______________________________________________
> diffserv mailing list
> diffserv@ietf.org
> http://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/diffserv
> Archive: http://www2.ietf.org/mail-archive/working-groups/diffserv/current/maillist.html
--
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Brian E Carpenter
Distinguished Engineer, Internet Standards & Technology, IBM
On assignment for IBM at http://www.iCAIR.org
Board Chairman, Internet Society http://www.isoc.org