Ravi,
Thanks. However, can one of the drat authors provide me with a more definitive answer as well as point me to the words in the draft which state the proper handling?
Regards,
Tina Iliff
-----Original Message-----
From: Sahita, Ravi [mailto:ravi.sahita@intel.com]
Sent: Friday, March 16, 2001 6:04 PM
To: Iliff, Tina; 'rap@ops.ietf.org'; 'diffserv-interest@external.cisco.com'; 'diffserv@ietf.org'
Subject: RE: [Diffserv] COPS-PR 05 question: Policy Updates
Tina,
I think that the PEP should be able to process the policy
updates if the PDP makes sure that the references to the PRC
instances in this changed subset of the PIB are still valid.
Ravi
-----Original Message-----
From: Iliff, Tina [mailto:Tina.Iliff@WCOM.Com]
Sent: Thursday, March 15, 2001 10:51 AM
To: 'rap@ops.ietf.org'; 'diffserv-interest@external.cisco.com';
'diffserv@ietf.org'
Cc: Ngo, Dai (c); Chastain, Jean
Subject: [Diffserv] COPS-PR 05 question: Policy Updates
All,
I have a question pertaining to the PDP providing policy updates
(specifically QoS/Diffserv PIB) to the PEP. Please let me know if this
question belongs on another mailing list. Anyhow, can a PDP only send data
from one or two tables in a DEC without also providing Interface Name and
Role Combination data? In other words, would the PEP look at pointer values
to determine what policy set this subset updates?
Regards,
Tina Iliff
_______________________________________________
diffserv mailing list
diffserv@ietf.org
http://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/diffserv
Archive:
http://www2.ietf.org/mail-archive/working-groups/diffserv/current/maillist.h
tml