Re: draft-jacquenet-ip-te-cops-01.txt

["Yacine El Mghazli" <yacine.el_mghazli@alcatel.fr>]

Christian,

Why do you use a new client type for provisioning purposes instead of the
already existing COPS-PR one ?
What prevent you from using the normal provisioning scheme ? I'm sure you
have any good reason but I can't get it, I'm not a routing/TE expert !
Thanx
Yacine

----- Original Message -----
From: "JACQUENET Christian FTRD/DMI/CAE"
<christian.jacquenet@rd.francetelecom.fr>
To: "'Andrew Smith (co-chair rap)'" <ah_smith@pacbell.net>; "'Mark Stevens
(co-chair rap)'" <mstevens@ellacoya.com>
Cc: <rap@ops.ietf.org>
Sent: Monday, March 05, 2001 11:17 AM
Subject: draft-jacquenet-ip-te-cops-01.txt


> Dear all,
>
> FYI: A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts
> directories.
>
>
> Title : A COPS client-type for IP traffic engineering
> Author(s) : C. Jacquenet
> Filename : draft-jacquenet-ip-te-cops-01.txt
> Pages : 14
> Date : 01-Mar-01
>
> This draft specifies a COPS (Common Open Policy Service, [2])client-
> type designed for the enforcement of IP Traffic Engineering (IP TE)
> policies within IP networks. The usage of this IP TE COPS client-type
> is based upon the activation of the COPS protocol for policy
> provisioning purposes (COPS-PR, [3]).
>
> A URL for this Internet-Draft is:
> http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-jacquenet-ip-te-cops-01.txt
>
> Depending on the current rap agenda for the Minneapolis meeting, would it
be
> possible to get allocated a 10-minute slot for a presentation of this
draft?
>
> Comments on this spec are warmly welcome.
>
> Cheers,
>
> Christian.
>
>
>