SPPI data type assignments

["David T. Perkins" <dperkins@dsperkins.com>]

HI,

I noticed that there are some conflicts with the data type definitions
in the SPPI I-D. The following assignment in the SPPI document:
  Integer64 ::= [APPLICATION 7]
          IMPLICIT INTEGER (-9223372036854775808..9223372036854775807) 
conflicts with the following assignment from RFC 1442:
  UInteger32 ::= [APPLICATION 7]
          IMPLICIT INTEGER (0..4294967295)

The following assignment from the SPPI document:
   Unsigned64 [APPLICATION 8] IMPLICIT INTEGER (0..18446744073709551615) 
conflicts with the following assignment found in internet-draft
draft-perkins-float-00.txt:
   FloatType ::= [APPLICATION 8] IMPLICIT OCTET STRING (SIZE(4))

Also in internet-draft draft-perkins-bigint-00.txt there are the
following definitions for signed and unsigned 64-bit integers:
   -- A signed integer of up to 64 bits of precision.
   I64Type ::= [APPLICATION 10] IMPLICIT
                   INTEGER (-9223372036854775808..9223372036854775807)

   -- An unsigned integer of up to 64 bit of precision.
   U64Type ::= [APPLICATION 11] IMPLICIT
                    INTEGER (0.. 18446744073709551615)

Note that the above assignments from the perkins I-Ds are in use
in the net-snmp distribution (previously called the UC-DAVIS SNMP
distribution). (See http://net-snmp.sourceforge.net/)

Thus, I believe that the SPPI should be updated to use
"[APPLICATION 10]" and "[APPLICATION 11]" instead of
"[APPLICATION 7]" and "[APPLICATION 8]". 

Regards,
/david t. perkins