RE: Can't find MIB module in Framework PIB draft

["Wijnen, Bert (Bert)" <bwijnen@lucent.com>]

Better to use RFC2851. That is the Proposed Standard which
resulted from the internet draft that you refer to.

Bert



> ----------
> From: 	Sanjeev Chakravarty[SMTP:schakrav@ics.uci.edu]
> Reply To: 	schakrav@ics.uci.edu
> Sent: 	Saturday, November 25, 2000 5:26 AM
> To: 	rap@ops.ietf.org
> Cc: 	'Tan You Leong'
> Subject: 	RE: Can't find MIB module in Framework PIB draft
> 
> 
> Hi You Leong,
> 
> The following link was obtained using "google.com":
> 
> http://www.aciri.org/fenner/mibs/extracted/INET-ADDRESS-MIB-ops-08.txt
> 
> Sanjeev
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-rap@ops.ietf.org [mailto:owner-rap@ops.ietf.org]On Behalf Of
> Tan You Leong
> Sent: Friday, November 24, 2000 4:01 PM
> To: rap@ops.ietf.org
> Subject: Can't find MIB module in Framework PIB draft
> 
> 
> I was reading the internet draft on Framework Policy Information Base
> (draft-ietf-rap-frameworkpib-02.txt). On page 9 of the definitions of
> Framework PIB modules, a reference was made to a MIB called INET-ADDRESS
> -MIB (inside the IMPORTS construct). I'm new in this field, and I couldn't
> find the whereabout of this MIB file on the web. Can somebody enlighten me
> on this? 
> 
> Thanx a lot!!
> 
> Cheers.
> --You Leong
> 
> Life is short. Work hard and PLAY hard.
> 
>    o      o     o    o     o    <o     <o>    o>    o
>   .|.    \|.   \|/   //    X     \      |    <|    <|>
>   / \     >\   /<    >\   /<     >\    /<     >\   /<
> 
> 
>