Hi, >> * For the Input-* & Output-* attributes (Section 2.2.3 ~ 2.2.6), Shall >> we "re-use" the type specified in RFC2866, like 245.1.47, etc. > I would strongly recommend not doing that. Re-using the type would > lead people to conclude that the type space for TLVs is the same as the > type space for "normal" RADIUS attributes. This is not the case. Also, the data types used here are actually *different* (64 bit integer). Giving them the same number as an already existing attribute with a mismatching data types invites sloppiness errors in implementations. Greetings, Stefan Winter -- Stefan WINTER Ingenieur de Recherche Fondation RESTENA - Réseau Téléinformatique de l'Education Nationale et de la Recherche 6, rue Richard Coudenhove-Kalergi L-1359 Luxembourg Tel: +352 424409 1 Fax: +352 422473
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature