[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [radext] #69: Section 1

#69: Section 1

Changes (by wdec@â):

  * status:  new => assigned


Comment:

 Agreed with one caveat. I'm not sure that the framed-ipv6-route was
 intended for use with RIPng. It seems more like being intended to be
 intended for the NAS to install the specified route towards the client,
 which then may be redistributed into some IGP. This is different than
 advertising a route to a client by means of ICMPv6 or DHCPv6.

 Awaiting a response.

-- 
---------------------------------------+------------------------------------
 Reporter:  bernard_aboba@â            |       Owner:  wdec@â        
     Type:  defect                     |      Status:  assigned      
 Priority:  major                      |   Milestone:  milestone1    
Component:  ipv6-access                |     Version:  1.0           
 Severity:  In WG Last Call            |    Keywords:                
---------------------------------------+------------------------------------

Ticket URL: <http://trac.tools.ietf.org/wg/radext/trac/ticket/69#comment:2>
radext <http://tools.ietf.org/radext/>


--
to unsubscribe send a message to radiusext-request@ops.ietf.org with
the word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body.
archive: <http://psg.com/lists/radiusext/>