[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[radext] #81: Location Privacy

#81: Location Privacy

 Section 4.2 states:

 If
    possible, it is desirable for proposals to provide for the encryption
    of existing attributes.  This includes existing "hidden" attributes
    as well as attributes (such as location attributes) that require
    confidentiality.

 [BA] GEOPRIV requirements are described in RFC 3693; this should probably
 be referenced here.  Also, "desirable" appears to be used as a synonym for
 RECOMMENDED here.  Should this be changed?

-- 
---------------------------------------+------------------------------------
 Reporter:  bernard_aboba@â            |       Owner:            
     Type:  defect                     |      Status:  new       
 Priority:  major                      |   Milestone:  milestone1
Component:  Crypto-Agility             |     Version:  1.0       
 Severity:  Active WG Document         |    Keywords:            
---------------------------------------+------------------------------------

Ticket URL: <https://wiki.tools.ietf.org/wg/radext/trac/ticket/81>
radext <http://tools.ietf.org/radext/>


--
to unsubscribe send a message to radiusext-request@ops.ietf.org with
the word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body.
archive: <http://psg.com/lists/radiusext/>