[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: [radext] #42: A1.4



>  [BA] Mailing list discussion indicates that there is not consensus to
>  deprecate existing RADIUS types.  Suggested change:
> 
>     There is a trade-off in design between re-using existing formats for
>     historical compatibility, or choosing new formats for a "better"
>     design.  This trade-off does not always require the "better" design
>     to be used.  As a result. pre-existing complex data types described
>     in Appendix B MAY be used.

As much as it disappoints me personally, I don't dispute the fact.  We did
not obtain consensus.  



--
to unsubscribe send a message to radiusext-request@ops.ietf.org with
the word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body.
archive: <http://psg.com/lists/radiusext/>