[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: RADEXT WG last call on RADIUS attributes for IPv6 Access Networks
Hi Peter,
----- Original Message ----
> From: Peter Deacon <peterd@iea-software.com>
> To: radiusext@ops.ietf.org
> Sent: Mon, March 1, 2010 2:12:20 PM
> Subject: Re: RADEXT WG last call on RADIUS attributes for IPv6 Access Networks
>
> On Mon, 1 Mar 2010, Bernard Aboba wrote:
> This is an announcement of
> RADEXT WG last call on âRADIUS attributes for IPv6
> Access Networksâ
> before sending the document off to the IESG for
> consideration as a
> Proposed Standard. ÂA copy of the document is available
> for inspection
> here:
>
> http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-radext-ipv6-access
3.1.
I'm
> confused on IPv6-Framed-Address and Framed-IPv6-Prefix from RFC 3162. It looks
> as if both attributes accomplish the same goal. Is there a difference
> between IPv6-Framed-Address and Framed-IPv6-Prefix of
> /128?
I don't think Framed-IPv6-Prefix was intended to be an attribute for an address. Yes Framed-IPv6-PrefixÂcould become like an address but /128 is the only case, data point.
Regards,
Behcet
--
to unsubscribe send a message to radiusext-request@ops.ietf.org with
the word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body.
archive: <http://psg.com/lists/radiusext/>