RE: passive packet measurement

[Randy Bush <randy@research.att.com>]

[ psamp list added to cc:s ]

<ad hat on>

we are trying to keep psamp and ipfix efforts separate.  

ipfix has a major, noble, but not simple goal, getting _flow_ measurement
as it is standardized so data from multiple vendors are comensurate and
similarly controllable.

psamp is to work on non-flow sampling.

nick and crew, it might be good to get a charter discussion going on the
psamp mailing list.

randy

to unsubscribe send a message to psamp-request@ops.ietf.org with
the word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body.