RE: draft-ietf-opsec-infrastructure-security-01 additional comments

["Smith, Donald" <Donald.Smith@qwest.com>]

I agree control plane protection should be included on the edges.

if( sent(protocol= 1, type=8) && 
!((received()=(protocol=1,type=0))))
then plz reping.
Donald.Smith@qwest.com giac 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-opsec@psg.com [mailto:owner-opsec@psg.com] On 
> Behalf Of hjan
> Sent: Saturday, April 28, 2007 1:05 AM
> To: opsec@ops.ietf.org
> Subject: Re: draft-ietf-opsec-infrastructure-security-01 
> additional comments
> 
> A comment marked with GL>
> 
>  3.3
>     The potential impact on the device's performance must be 
> taken into
>     consideration when deploying EIACLs.
> 
> GL> device's  performance is generic. I'll try to better explain wich
> GL> device component performance are impacted, i.e LC and RP.
> GL> Last on edge device we shall consider Control Plane 
> control and not
>   GL> only EIACL.
> 
> 
> Regards,
> ---
> Gianluca
> Genoa, IT
> 
> 
> 
> 


This communication is the property of Qwest and may contain confidential or
privileged information. Unauthorized use of this communication is strictly 
prohibited and may be unlawful.  If you have received this communication 
in error, please immediately notify the sender by reply e-mail and destroy 
all copies of the communication and any attachments.