[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: draft-ietf-opsec--infrastructure-security-00.txt
I guess my main question/comment is, is whats in this draft
(draft-ietf-opsec-infrastructure-security-00.txt) actual, current
practice or is it a good set of "shoulds" ? 2267 (ingress filtering)
is a good idea, but I think it's still far from a universal practice.
On the other hand, I think draft-ietf-opsec-current-practices-07.txt
was the result of an extensive survey of *actual* *current* *practices*
of operators.
If I had to vote between the two, I'd vote for the latter being BCP....but
both are fine docs.
One small comment on *-infrastrucure-security-00.txt, you need to add
references for all your citatoins (e.g. 2267, 3704 are cited but not listed
in the references). xml2rfc will catch stuff like this for you.
---George Jones