RE: SML (Service Modeling Language) info

["Wijnen, Bert (Bert)" <bwijnen@lucent.com>]

So is the spec accessible to us?

Bert

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Golovinsky, Eugene [mailto:Eugene_Golovinsky@bmc.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, August 01, 2006 15:56
> To: Romascanu, Dan (Dan); Wijnen, Bert (Bert); David T. Perkins
> Cc: Ops-Nm (E-mail); serviceml@external.cisco.com
> Subject: RE: SML (Service Modeling Language) info
> 
> 
> Dan.
> This is exactly the reason why I contacted you last week re 
> the Spec. I
> took an action item from the SML team to contact IETF and see if there
> is an interest and also to do just that to keep all parties informed
> about what is going on in different areas of the industry.
> 
> As you absolutely correctly pointed out, industry can not 
> really afford
> the effort duplication.
> 
> --Gene
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Romascanu, Dan (Dan) [mailto:dromasca@avaya.com] 
> Sent: Tuesday, August 01, 2006 1:09 AM
> To: Wijnen, Bert (Bert); David T. Perkins
> Cc: Ops-Nm (E-mail); Golovinsky, Eugene
> Subject: RE: SML (Service Modeling Language) info
> 
> Fun is such a personal and relative thing :-)
> 
> Seriously, it is not clear to me where these harmonization 
> efforts will
> go or what will result eventually out of what they do. However, I
> believe that there is value in knowing what each other does and trying
> to avoid multiplication of efforts or concurrent development in an
> industry that does not have that many resources available at 
> this stage.
> For this purpose it is good to provide to these groups pointers to the
> IETF work especially Netconf and encourage individuals and teams to
> bring their proposals to the IETF as Internet-Drafts and/or inputs to
> the Netconf data modeling call for contributions.
> 
> 
>  
>  
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: owner-ops-nm@ops.ietf.org 
> > [mailto:owner-ops-nm@ops.ietf.org] On Behalf Of Wijnen, Bert (Bert)
> > Sent: Tuesday, August 01, 2006 1:08 AM
> > To: David T. Perkins
> > Cc: Ops-Nm (E-mail)
> > Subject: RE: SML (Service Modeling Language) info
> > 
> > Also be aware that the TMF is suggesting SID as a 
> > "fedewration of models"
> > which I have called "spagethy bowl approach".
> > 
> > The NGNMFG together with TMF and ETSI TISPAN have 
> > "harmonization" efforts underway. 
> > 
> > It is all so much fun where specific individuals or companies 
> > are pushing their approach (or an approach based on their system).
> > 
> > Bert
> > 
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: David T. Perkins [mailto:dperkins@dsperkins.com]
> > > Sent: Monday, July 31, 2006 23:41
> > > To: Wijnen, Bert (Bert)
> > > Cc: Ops-Nm (E-mail)
> > > Subject: Re: SML (Service Modeling Language) info
> > > 
> > > 
> > > HI,
> > > 
> > > To, the interesting part is the last paragraph...
> > > He[Tatarinov] said that SML will be complementary to the Common 
> > > Information Model (CIM) standard from the Distributed 
> > Management Task 
> > > Force (DMTF) standards body.
> > > 
> > > On Mon, 31 Jul 2006, Wijnen, Bert (Bert) wrote:
> > > > This might be intersting to at least be aware of
> > > > 
> > > >    
> > > http://news.com.com/Heavies+float+data+center+standard/2100-10
> > > 13_3-6100384.html?type=pt&part=inv&tag=feed&subj=news
> > > > 
> > > > The first few paragraphs:
> > > > 
> > > > Computing industry heavyweights on Monday announced a plan
> > > to create a standardized way for computing resources to 
> > "talk" to each 
> > > other, a move they say will lower the cost of running 
> > corporate data 
> > > centers.
> > > > 
> > > > The initiative calls for the creation of an XML-based
> > > standard, called Service Modeling Language (SML), and its 
> > adoption in 
> > > commercial products, including systems management software, 
> > hardware, 
> > > and application development tools.
> > > > 
> > > > 
> > > > Bert
> > > > 
> > > Regards,
> > > /david t. perkiuns
> > > 
> > 
> > 
>