[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Routing requirements draft

To: "Romascanu, Dan \(Dan\)" <dromasca@avaya.com>
Subject: Re: Routing requirements draft
From: Eliot Lear <lear@cisco.com>
Date: Tue, 11 Jul 2006 06:08:57 +0200
Authentication-results: sj-dkim-2.cisco.com; header.From=lear@cisco.com; dkim=pass ( sig from cisco.com verified; );
Cc: "Ops-Nm (E-mail)" <ops-nm@ops.ietf.org>, mreview@ops.ietf.org
Dkim-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; l=518; t=1152590939; x=1153454939; c=relaxed/simple; s=sjdkim2001; h=Content-Type:From:Subject:Content-Transfer-Encoding:MIME-Version; d=cisco.com; i=lear@cisco.com; z=From:Eliot=20Lear=20<lear@cisco.com> |Subject:Re=3A=20Routing=20requirements=20draft; X=v=3Dcisco.com=3B=20h=3Dv5K4hyGALWrpDARC4hhg3Oe/wOk=3D; b=Z8b42GlvTdoZ1TEuGqYlX1Fv6QmpOTVOjjmenyicDtzZ7xeXmGfwpFZEkNG+OuD1c40fKsB6 wD4XzVCaPaaBhV5PHx4aLDYi80arbxxVucMxK2A1kyxUSw+EBeMcKYCt;
In-reply-to: <AAB4B3D3CF0F454F98272CBE187FDE2F0ACF86C6@is0004avexu1.global.avaya.com>
References: <AAB4B3D3CF0F454F98272CBE187FDE2F0ACF86C6@is0004avexu1.global.avaya.com>
User-agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.4 (Macintosh/20060530)

Romascanu, Dan (Dan) wrote:
> This is the question that we are discussing. I personally do not know
> the answer to it. 
>
> But I know that the alternative today - mandating the writing of MIB
> modules - does not work well in many cases. 
>
> Dan

I agree with what you wrote, and I even believe one should consider
manageability prior to thinking about bits on a wire.  My only point is
that if we are heavy handed about this, particularly in the routing
area, the results will be perverse.

Eliot

References:
- RE: Routing requirements draft
  - From: "Romascanu, Dan \(Dan\)" <dromasca@avaya.com>

Prev by Date: RE: Routing requirements draft
Next by Date: RE: Routing requirements draft
Previous by thread: RE: Routing requirements draft
Next by thread: RE: Routing requirements draft
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread