[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: SNMP question

To: "Wijnen, Bert (Bert)" <bwijnen@lucent.com>
Subject: Re: SNMP question
From: chum <chum@noos.fr>
Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2004 00:39:06 +0100
Cc: ops-nm@ops.ietf.org
In-reply-to: <7D5D48D2CAA3D84C813F5B154F43B155033D3C7D@nl0006exch001u.nl.lucent.com>
References: <7D5D48D2CAA3D84C813F5B154F43B155033D3C7D@nl0006exch001u.nl.lucent.com>
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.5b) Gecko/20030901 Thunderbird/0.2

Thank you very much.

Wijnen, Bert (Bert) wrote:

If you look at the DIFFSERV MIB (RFC3289), and if you take into account that that MIB representes the management objects for Diffservv at a managed device (or SNMP agent if you like) then indeed you interpretation to consider an SNMP manager as PDP

and an SNMP agent as PDP (in the

I guess you wanted to say "as PEP".

context of these tpyes of MIB modules).

Best regards,

References:
- RE: SNMP question
  - From: "Wijnen, Bert (Bert)" <bwijnen@lucent.com>

Prev by Date: RE: SNMP question
Next by Date: FW: Call For Paper for Integrated Network Management 2005
Previous by thread: RE: SNMP question
Next by thread: RE: SNMP question
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread