[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Question regarding the scope of the WG
- To: Bill Woodcock <woody@pch.net>
- Subject: Re: Question regarding the scope of the WG
- From: Brad Volz <bradv@affectation.org>
- Date: Mon, 25 Jun 2001 14:43:57 -0700
- Cc: ops-nm@ops.ietf.org
- Delivery-date: Mon, 25 Jun 2001 14:45:06 -0700
- Envelope-to: ops-nm-data@psg.com
- User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i
Mon, Jun 25, 2001 at 02:09:26PM -0700, Bill Woodcock said:
>·
> The scope of the operator requirements draft is to assess and
> present the
> requirements which network operators have of their infrastructure
> management tools.
Apologies if I was not clear in stating my question. I did not
mean to imply that a new Working Group would be formed. When I was
referring to 'the Working Group' I meant the Operations and
Management Area.
Stated another way, I am curious about what the goals of the
Draft are. To me, infrastructure management tools could
include at least the following:-
»·······configuration database
»·······configuration generator
»·······tool to push the config to the network
»·······trend analysis tools
»·······billing collection
»·······tools to evaluate network health
This however seems like quite a lot to cover, so that is the
reason that I asked about the scope of the Draft.
Apologies if my earlier wording was poorly thought out.
--bradv