RE: Question regarding the scope of the WG

["Wijnen, Bert (Bert)" <bwijnen@lucent.com>]

Bill, you are correct. 
I am willing to "hoist" the draft under the ops area if you prefer
that over an individual submission. L:et us first see the document
and then when we agree on it, we can talk about next steps.

Bert

> ----------
> From: 	Bill Woodcock[SMTP:woody@pch.net]
> Sent: 	Monday, June 25, 2001 11:09 PM
> To: 	Brad Volz
> Cc: 	ops-nm@ops.ietf.org
> Subject: 	Re: Question regarding the scope of the WG
> 
>       On Mon, 25 Jun 2001, Brad Volz wrote:
>     > I am specifically interested in what the scope of Network Management
>     > is that the WG intends to address.
> 
> Randy or Bert, please correct me if I'm wrong, but I don't believe there's
> been any intention of forming a working group expressed to date.  I
> believe that all that's currently under discussion is the operator
> requirements draft.  Once the requirements are agreed upon, it may then
> become apparent that either a new working group is necessary, or that the
> work fits within the scope of one of the current working groups, or that
> it is appropriate to divide different requirements among different
> existing or new working groups.
> 
> The scope of the operator requirements draft is to assess and present the
> requirements which network operators have of their infrastructure
> management tools.
> 
>                                 -Bill
> 
> 
>