[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Status update
>>>>> Walter Weiss writes:
Walter> I have stated publicly on numerous occassions that I am not
Walter> interested in coming up with yet another language (existing or
Walter> new) that adds work rather than deminish it.
Yes. This would be kind of a disaster.
Walter> On the other hand, it will be hard to place dependencies on
Walter> other working groups when the outcome is still in
Walter> question. Hence, I see little value in advocating a model for
Walter> using the results of this activity (to the IETF at large)
Walter> until after this activity is formalized and the outcome of the
Walter> work is a little clearer.
Which really sounds as if this activity belongs into the IRTF rather
than the IETF. I know an IRTF group which is already working on ideas
closely related to NIM... ;-)
/js
--
Juergen Schoenwaelder Technical University Braunschweig
<schoenw@ibr.cs.tu-bs.de> Dept. Operating Systems & Computer Networks
Phone: +49 531 391 3289 Bueltenweg 74/75, 38106 Braunschweig, Germany
Fax: +49 531 391 5936 <URL:http://www.ibr.cs.tu-bs.de/~schoenw/>