Phil Shafer wrote:
"Sharon Chisholm" writes:I believe this was discussed previously. Version numbers are included for protocol definitions, not for the content definitions.Can you repeat the theory behind this? Why are they good for one and not good for the other? Does content never change?
The theory is that change control rules will be in place for content, so backward compatibility will be provided. I agree with you that backward compatibility applies just as much to protocol features as content.
Thanks, Phil
Andy -- to unsubscribe send a message to netconf-request@ops.ietf.org with the word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body. archive: <http://ops.ietf.org/lists/netconf/>