[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: action RPC I-D
- To: "Andy Bierman" <ietf@andybierman.com>, "Netconf \(E-mail\)" <netconf@ops.ietf.org>
- Subject: Re: action RPC I-D
- From: "Steven Berl \(sberl\)" <sberl@cisco.com>
- Date: Fri, 13 Oct 2006 14:41:22 -0700
- Authentication-results: sj-dkim-1.cisco.com; header.From=sberl@cisco.com; dkim=pass ( 25 extraneous bytes; sig from cisco.com verified; );
- Cc: "Balazs Lengyel" <balazs.lengyel@ericsson.com>
- Dkim-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; l=3838; t=1160775685; x=1161639685; c=relaxed/simple; s=sjdkim1002; h=Content-Type:From:Subject:Content-Transfer-Encoding:MIME-Version; d=cisco.com; i=sberl@cisco.com; z=From:=22Steven=20Berl=20\(sberl\)=22=20<sberl@cisco.com> |Subject:Re=3A=20action=20RPC=20I-D; X=v=3Dcisco.com=3B=20h=3D1hZviWNDog8m/WrsS9o0GyVosEc=3D; b=UtLapvBaTYpkvbpdoE9pO1Jnxsrg6y06jMAPgjTJpNuFZQb6U/QDl79wi7WbGf8t2w/QwZ7G Oe53yX3IN7CLQu0bDkXxIq7IUZiFBPFhi/ANKTieSuZ7441DNc5dZCs0;
- In-reply-to: <452FFE43.4010407@andybierman.com>
Why wouldn't we define standard actions? Seems like there are several the
would be useful. Off the top of my head
- reboot
- file system operations such as:
- copy
- delete
- rename
- erase/format
- mkdir
- ping
- traceroute
-steve
On 10/13/06 1:59 PM, "Andy Bierman" <ietf@andybierman.com> wrote:
> Do we really need a standard "action" RPC method container,
> without defining any actual standard actions?
>
> thanks,
> Andy
>
Attachment:
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature