[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: SSH channels
Martin Bjorklund writes:
>In draft-ietf-netconf-ssh-05,txt, section 5 implies that multiple
>channels are not supported (at least not very cleanly), since it
>explicitly states that when an agent receives a <close-session>, it
>shall terminate the SSH session and the TCP connection.
I don't see this. Section 3 of draft-ietf-netconf-ssh-06.txt reads:
After the ssh-connection service is established, the client will open
a channel of type "session", which will result in an SSH session.
So the "SSH session" refers to the SSH channel of type "session".
Then in Section 5, we have:
... When the agent processes a <close-session>
command, the agent shall respond and terminate the SSH session. The
agent MUST NOT process any RPC commands received on the current
session after the <close-session> command.
If you see the use of netconf over a distinct channel as a distinct
netconf session, then the close-session on one would not affect the
other. You get this for free with openssh, since the ssh daemon spawns
the subsystem as a child process, cleaning up when all children have
been reaped. If you start two netconf subsystems, sshd will continue
until both have died.
The other reading would mean that <close-session> would need to kill
the parent sshd. Even so, if the only thing blocking this is the close
RPC, we could fix the close RPC.
Thanks,
Phil
--
to unsubscribe send a message to netconf-request@ops.ietf.org with
the word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body.
archive: <http://ops.ietf.org/lists/netconf/>