Re: Update to Netconf Notifications Draft

[Phil Shafer <phil@juniper.net>]

Andy Bierman writes:
>I changed the name from "endless RPC" to "extended RPC"
>because it does end if so requested.

I called them long-lived RPCs in the draft, which seems fairly
accurate.

>> Also, even if the model in Sharon's draft is used for events, the
>> endless RPC can still be used for ping-like commands.
>Yes, you can already do this -- without changing a single
>word in the NETCONF spec.

I think this is the big difference between the drafts.  Use the
existing netconf RPC mechanism to deliver existing syslog data
versus use a new mechanism to delivery new content.

Thanks,
 Phil

--
to unsubscribe send a message to netconf-request@ops.ietf.org with
the word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body.
archive: <http://ops.ietf.org/lists/netconf/>