[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: draft-shafer-netconf-syslog-00.txt
Phil Shafer <phil@juniper.net> wrote:
> I've finally got an initial version of the draft for a netconf
> capability that makes syslog data available over long-lived RPCs.
I have read this well-written draft, and I have a few comments.
o The <event> parameter is defined as a regexp which must match the
name of the syslog event. What is the name of a syslog event?
From the examples it looks like it might be the MSGID defined in
draft-ietf-syslog-protocol-17.txt?
o In 3.2.1, you write
The <priority>, <event>, and <parameter> parameters are only
supported if the requested stream is in the "structured-data"
format.
Why is priority supported only for structured-data?
o Is it correct to assume that a stream is fully defined by the
parameters in the <stream> element? If so, should there really
be a new rpc operation <get-syslog-streams>? You also write that
the stream definitions may be part of the configuration. Thus,
shouldn't the stream definitions be available by using <get> or
<get-config> instead?
o You use the terms "recorded events" and "historical data". I
assume they mean the same thing?
o For <text-pattern>, does it match the MSG part of a
"structured-data" event, or the entire formatted event?
o The examples in 3.2.2.1 are supposed to show the same events in
different formats, but they are not. (nit: the 'syslog-events'
element is closed prematurely in these examples (same thing for
get-syslog-event in 3.2.1.2 as well)).
/martin
--
to unsubscribe send a message to netconf-request@ops.ietf.org with
the word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body.
archive: <http://ops.ietf.org/lists/netconf/>