[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: max-access: access control model discussion

To: Sharon Chisholm <schishol@nortel.com>
Subject: Re: max-access: access control model discussion
From: Andy Bierman <ietf@andybierman.com>
Date: Mon, 29 May 2006 07:17:50 -0700
Cc: Netconf Data Model Discussion <netconfmodel@lists.nortel.com>, "Netconf (E-mail)" <netconf@ops.ietf.org>
In-reply-to: <713043CE8B8E1348AF3C546DBE02C1B408B1E1F4@zcarhxm2.corp.nortel.com>
References: <713043CE8B8E1348AF3C546DBE02C1B408B1E1F4@zcarhxm2.corp.nortel.com>
User-agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.2 (Windows/20060308)

Sharon Chisholm wrote:

hi

I don't think there is any requirement to support a mapping of the SMIv2
max-access clause in Netconf. What there is a requirement to be able to
specify which operations make operational for a particular data element.
We should define this to be only what we need for Netconf.


No requirement.
As I said, it is only important if one ever plans to reuse
any SMIv2 data models in NETCONF.  If you are planning on
ignoring almost two decades of IETF data modeling work,
this is not important.


Sharon


Andy

--
to unsubscribe send a message to netconf-request@ops.ietf.org with
the word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body.
archive: <http://ops.ietf.org/lists/netconf/>

References:
- RE: max-access: access control model discussion
  - From: "Sharon Chisholm" <schishol@nortel.com>

Prev by Date: Re: subtree filter spec vs. implementation
Next by Date: Re: subtree filter spec vs. implementation
Previous by thread: RE: max-access: access control model discussion
Next by thread: RE: max-access: access control model discussion
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread