[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: architecture and security

To: "Netconf \(E-mail\)" <netconf@ops.ietf.org>
Subject: Re: architecture and security
From: "Randy Presuhn" <randy_presuhn@mindspring.com>
Date: Mon, 10 Apr 2006 12:03:54 -0700
References: <Pine.LNX.4.10.10604101126230.13053-100000@shell4.bayarea.net>

Hi -
 
> From: "David T. Perkins" <dperkins@dsperkins.com>
> To: "Randy Presuhn" <randy_presuhn@mindspring.com>
> Cc: "Netconf (E-mail)" <netconf@ops.ietf.org>
> Sent: Monday, April 10, 2006 11:34 AM
> Subject: Re: architecture and security
... 
> Given the desire "to make part of management information
> such as that for a single interface available to users
> of that part and not to other users", SNMPv3 attempts
> to do this via setting up VACM authorization rules.
> The result is an inconsistent set of management info.
...

How so?

Randy


--
to unsubscribe send a message to netconf-request@ops.ietf.org with
the word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body.
archive: <http://ops.ietf.org/lists/netconf/>

Follow-Ups:
- Re: architecture and security
  - From: Juergen Schoenwaelder <j.schoenwaelder@iu-bremen.de>
- Re: architecture and security
  - From: "David T. Perkins" <dperkins@dsperkins.com>

References:
- Re: architecture and security
  - From: "David T. Perkins" <dperkins@dsperkins.com>

Prev by Date: Re: architecture and security
Next by Date: Re: architecture and security
Previous by thread: Re: architecture and security
Next by thread: Re: architecture and security
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread