[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: NETCONF Port Decision

McDonald, Ira wrote:

Hi Andy,

No objection, but clear WG concensus is NOT sufficient.
Bert Wijnen specifically asked for a technical justification
of the working group's decision - NOT just a decision.



I didn't list the factors in this mail.
The main justification is that NETCONF is designed
to replace CLI over SSH, which is run on a system port,
and considered to be a task that is only performed by privileged users.




[Also - small process thing - decisions in IETF WG's and on
their concensus happen _only_ on mailing lists, not in any
face-to-face meetings, per IETF Standards Process.]
Cheers, 
- Ira


Andy



--
to unsubscribe send a message to netconf-request@ops.ietf.org with
the word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body.
archive: <http://ops.ietf.org/lists/netconf/>