RE: lock

["David B Harrington" <dbharrington@comcast.net>]

> >Martin Bjorklund <mbj@tail-f.com> wrote:
> >> I assume that this mean that the last condition applies only to
the
> >> candidate configuration, since this is the only target 
> configuration
> >> that can be committed through NETCONF. So the text could have
been:
> >> 
> >>       *  the target configuration is 'candidate' and it has
already
> >>          been modified and these changes have not been committed
or
> >>          rolled  back.
> >> 
> >> Is this correct?
> 
> Yes, this is correct.

Hi,

I think this is correct for version 1. 

There may be more than one possible candidate in future versions, and
specifying that "the target configuration is 'candidate'" would be
incompatible with those future versions.

David Harrington
dbharrington@comcast.net




--
to unsubscribe send a message to netconf-request@ops.ietf.org with
the word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body.
archive: <http://ops.ietf.org/lists/netconf/>