Re: IANA considerations update for NETCONF protocol draft

[Eliot Lear <lear@cisco.com>]

Rob Enns wrote:
> I'm not sure it's worth it either. My preference is to drop the IANA
> allocated enterprise capability registry. Enterprises defining their
> own capabilities can choose URIs that make sense to them. Much like
> XML namespaces, common sense would dictate the choice of a URI that
> won't clash with others. 
>   

Common sense is something that works with small numbers, but not with
large.  Why can't we solve this problem the same way SNMP solved it?  I
do think we can defer this until we see large numbers of netconf agent
implementations.

Eliot

--
to unsubscribe send a message to netconf-request@ops.ietf.org with
the word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body.
archive: <http://ops.ietf.org/lists/netconf/>