Re: NETCONF Notifications: Consensus Points

[Phil Shafer <phil@juniper.net>]

"Sharon Chisholm" writes:
>As someone more often then not ending up on the consuming end of
>management information, I tend to go for clarity over performance

But SD-Params are clear, right?  They are name=value pairs.  We
don't need anything more than that and another WG has a wonderful
draft that we can leverage to make our work easier in three ways,
specification, implementation, and acceptance.  We incorporate the
syslog WG's work by reference, vendors leverage their new NG syslog
implementation both for syslog and for netconf, and using syslog
allows providers to leverage their new and old syslog infrastructure
and tools.

We get performance _and_ clarity.  It's simpler _and_ easier.  It's
a dessert topping _and_ a floor cleaner.

Thanks,
 Phil

--
to unsubscribe send a message to netconf-request@ops.ietf.org with
the word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body.
archive: <http://ops.ietf.org/lists/netconf/>