[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: NETCONF Notifications: Consensus Points

To: "'Chris Elliott'" <chelliot@cisco.com>, "'Phil Shafer'" <phil@juniper.net>
Subject: RE: NETCONF Notifications: Consensus Points
From: "David B Harrington" <dbharrington@comcast.net>
Date: Wed, 30 Nov 2005 12:04:22 -0500
Cc: "'Andy Bierman'" <ietf@andybierman.com>, "'Balazs Lengyel'" <balazs.lengyel@ericsson.com>, <netconf@ops.ietf.org>
In-reply-to: <Pine.GSO.4.64.0511301147180.24328@rtp-cse-133.cisco.com>
Reply-to: <dbharrington@comcast.net>

 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-netconf@ops.ietf.org 
> [mailto:owner-netconf@ops.ietf.org] On Behalf Of Chris Elliott
>
> I'd rather not have to deal with two formats--and, yes, 
> certain apps will 
> have to deal with both formats and will have to try to resolve what
a 
> particular SD-Param relates to in XML, or the SNMP MIB, or 
> CLI...We have 
> enough formats already.
> 
I concur

David Harrington
dbharrington@comcast.net




--
to unsubscribe send a message to netconf-request@ops.ietf.org with
the word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body.
archive: <http://ops.ietf.org/lists/netconf/>

Follow-Ups:
- Re: NETCONF Notifications: Consensus Points
  - From: Andy Bierman <ietf@andybierman.com>

References:
- Re: NETCONF Notifications: Consensus Points
  - From: Chris Elliott <chelliot@cisco.com>

Prev by Date: Re: NETCONF Notifications: Consensus Points
Next by Date: RE: IANA considerations update for NETCONF protocol draft
Previous by thread: Re: NETCONF Notifications: Consensus Points
Next by thread: Re: NETCONF Notifications: Consensus Points
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread