Re: NETCONF Notifications: Consensus Points

[Phil Shafer <phil@juniper.net>]

Andy Bierman writes:
>The problem with your theory is the premise that people using XML care about
>encoding and transfer efficiency.

Well, my theory is that operators save lots of log data and won't
be happy about a 3x xml tax.  They then inspect log files, where
filtering is invaluable.  They want the juice, but in a cheaper
form.  Syslog w/ SD-Params fills the need without filling your
log servers.

FWIW, I take it as a given that they'll go crazy over SD data, but
that's a point that should be verified.  I know I'm drooling over it.

>It's not built for speed.  (Not built for comfort either ;-)

Yup, Willie Dixon would not be caught dead playing with XML.

Thanks,
 Phil

--
to unsubscribe send a message to netconf-request@ops.ietf.org with
the word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body.
archive: <http://ops.ietf.org/lists/netconf/>