RE: Tim Bray on RelaxNG

["David B Harrington" <dbharrington@comcast.net>]

I prefer egregious kludges; call it job security ;)
(just kidding, of course)

dbh 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-netconf@ops.ietf.org 
> [mailto:owner-netconf@ops.ietf.org] On Behalf Of Phil Shafer
> Sent: Monday, November 28, 2005 11:17 AM
> To: netconf@ops.ietf.org
> Subject: Tim Bray on RelaxNG
> 
> http://www1.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/xml-dir/current/msg00108.html
> 
>     As a general practice, I would advise the IETF to specify XML
>     languages using the simpler, more general, more flexible, more
>     interoperable RelaxNG, which is also an ISO standard by the
>     way. For example, Atompub did this in 
> draft-ietf-atompub-format-11,
>     which is now a proposed standard and waiting for its RFC number.
>     In particular, the kind of extensibility you want for XCON would
>     be easily modeled in RelaxNG without the need for this kind of
>     egregious kludge. -Tim Bray
> 
> 
> Can we revisit the use of Relax-NG for netconf (before we start
> resorting to egregious kludges ;^)?
> 
> Thanks,
>  Phil
> 
> --
> to unsubscribe send a message to netconf-request@ops.ietf.org with
> the word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body.
> archive: <http://ops.ietf.org/lists/netconf/>
> 



--
to unsubscribe send a message to netconf-request@ops.ietf.org with
the word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body.
archive: <http://ops.ietf.org/lists/netconf/>