<inline>
Tom Petch
----- Original Message -----
From: "Andy Bierman" <ietf@andybierman.com>
To: <j.schoenwaelder@iu-bremen.de>
Cc: "Tom Petch" <nwnetworks@dial.pipex.com>; <netconf@ops.ietf.org>
Sent: Tuesday, November 22, 2005 4:41 PM
Subject: Re: notification charter proposal
<snip>> >
That would be fine with me.
I brought up the issue because the problem is obviously worse
for notifications than RPCs, because the lack of an application
layer ACK (which <rpc-reply> effectively is).
The reason for setting a minimum is to allow NMS developers
to code to some reasonable minimum. The market will help
keep things somewhat reasonable, but we could see a range
from 1500 to 64K as the minimum. Is that OK?
Andy
I raised size because there are references appearing on the list calling for
something syslog-like and size has been an issue with syslog that has not been
satisfactorily resolved. syslog unearthed two contrasting viewpoints, one that
messages should not exceed 2k or even 1k, the other that 64k should be supported
(for at least one application).
Netconf is more virgin territory than syslog is but I do believe is setting a
Maximum size, at least to start with; but I do not see this as anything to do
with the charter:-).