Re: notification charter proposal

[Andy Bierman <ietf@andybierman.com>]

Glenn Waters wrote:

> > Yes, I can see that and it makes me think that there needs to be
> >    
> something
>  
>
> > about
> > that in the charter, clarifying what a notification is; otherwise, by
> > simultaneously adopting 'draft-chisholm-netconf-event-01.txt', I think
> >    
> we
>  
>
> > are
> > implicitly taking on board whatever that says.
> >    
>
> I disagree with the last statement. By taking on draft-chisholm we have
> a starting point for discussions and we can decide how to edit the text
> to meet our requirements.
>  

Glenn is correct.
It's even stronger than that.
Once an individual I-D becomes a WG I-D,
the individual(s) give up change control completely.
There is no guarantee that any of the original text
or even original authors will end up in the final RFC.
(That would be very unusual, but possible.)

I forget the RFC#.  It's not 3979 (IPR) but that one may apply.

> Regards, /gww 
>  

Andy

>  


--
to unsubscribe send a message to netconf-request@ops.ietf.org with
the word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body.
archive: <http://ops.ietf.org/lists/netconf/>