Re: Netconf Event Message as Working Group Document

[Andy Bierman <ietf@andybierman.com>]

Glenn Waters wrote:

> I support this working being adopted in the Netconf WG to support the
> line in the charter that says:
>
> "- Provides support for asynchronous notifications"
>
>  

2 more comments:

1) The charter text above is very vague.  From the XMLCONF days on
   through the time notifications were taken out of the NETCONF protocol,
   our entire (phase 1) work effort related to this charter item was to
   add a sentence pointing to the BEEP profile for RFC 3195. 

  IMO, adoption of Sharon's document is not covered by this charter item,
  and would require better charter text, WG approval, and AD approval.

>....

> > I would rather that the WG focus on an access control model for
> >    
> NETCONF.
>  
>
> > (Design it. Implement it. Refine it. Then bring it to the IETF for
> > standardization.)
> >    
>
> We have a draft for events that is being edited for its third revision,
> seems like there is support and work going on.
>
> With respect to access control we have zero drafts. I too would like to
> see access control worked on but I don't see the work.
>  

I would like to see "rough consensus AND RUNNING CODE", not just a draft.
IMO, we should get back to that in the IETF. 

>  
>
> > > Sharon Chisholm
> > > Nortel
> > > Ottawa, Ontario
> > > Canada
> > >      
> > Andy
> >    
>
> Glenn.
>  

Andy


--
to unsubscribe send a message to netconf-request@ops.ietf.org with
the word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body.
archive: <http://ops.ietf.org/lists/netconf/>