[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Forward: Notes from NETCONF interop tests
On Fri, Aug 05, 2005 at 09:36:54AM +0200, Simon Leinen / Radu State wrote:
> c. Message separator. Messages are separated with a special
> character string in Netconf/SSH draft. Some implementations use it,
> while others don?t rely on this mechanism.
I doubt very much that you can write a correct implementation without
the separator mechanism.
> Suggestions for the IETF working group
>
> 1) Better SSH descriptions and use cases
It would be extremely useful to know what is lacking in the ID. To me,
it sounds a bit like everything is indeed correctly written down but
the implementors either used a pretty old ID for the implementation
work or they glanced over some important paragraphs. If my feeling is
right, there is nothing that can be fixed. If I am wrong, I think it
would be extremely helpful if the interoperability testers can come up
with a proposal for the changes that would have helped them to not run
into this problem.
/js
--
Juergen Schoenwaelder International University Bremen
<http://www.eecs.iu-bremen.de/> P.O. Box 750 561, 28725 Bremen, Germany
--
to unsubscribe send a message to netconf-request@ops.ietf.org with
the word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body.
archive: <http://ops.ietf.org/lists/netconf/>