RE: I-D Publication Request: draft-ietf-netconf-soap-05.txt

["McDonald, Ira" <imcdonald@sharplabs.com>]

Hi Phil,

The draft certainly doesn't track that 'concensus'.  The draft
should explicitly say SHOULD NOT use port 80 for NetConf for
reliability and security reasons.

Cheers,
- Ira

Ira McDonald (Musician / Software Architect)
Blue Roof Music / High North Inc
PO Box 221  Grand Marais, MI  49839
phone: +1-906-494-2434
email: imcdonald@sharplabs.com

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Phil Shafer [mailto:phil@juniper.net]
> Sent: Monday, July 11, 2005 4:59 PM
> To: McDonald, Ira
> Cc: 'j.schoenwaelder@iu-bremen.de'; Ted Goddard; 'Sharon Chisholm';
> netconf
> Subject: Re: I-D Publication Request: draft-ietf-netconf-soap-05.txt 
> 
> 
> "McDonald, Ira" writes:
> >If you use a dedicated port, then much simpler protection can be
> >performed.
> 
> I think this issue is an old one.  We had concensus on
> not using port 80 and on requesting an official port.
> If the draft doesn't track this, it needs an update.
> 
> Thanks,
>  Phil
> 

--
to unsubscribe send a message to netconf-request@ops.ietf.org with
the word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body.
archive: <http://ops.ietf.org/lists/netconf/>