RE: Proposed Update to Netconf Charter

["Sharon Chisholm" <schishol@nortel.com>]

hi

More or less. That and we should ensure that everything plays nice with
a common security infrastructure, rather than each other

                  ___________
SNMP  --------   /           \
               /              \
CLI    -------/                \
              |   Miracle       \
Netconf -------\                |
                |              /
Syslog --------  \             \
                  --------------

As appose to

SNMP <--miracle --> Netconf
CLI  <--miracle --> Netconf
Syslog <--miracle --> Netconf
SNMP <--miracle--> CLI
SNMP <--miracle--> Syslog
CLI  <--miracle--> Syslog

Sharon

-----Original Message-----
From: Juergen Schoenwaelder [mailto:j.schoenwaelder@iu-bremen.de] 
Sent: Monday, July 11, 2005 8:11 AM
To: Chisholm, Sharon [CAR:5K50:EXCH]
Cc: netconf@ops.ietf.org
Subject: Re: Proposed Update to Netconf Charter


On Mon, Jul 11, 2005 at 08:00:57AM -0400, Sharon Chisholm wrote:

> I think the goal with access control should be to try to integrate 
> with existing deployed security solutions, not specifically with SNMP.

> If SNMP succeeds in ISMS, then it will all be integrated without 
> turning the netconf access control mechanisms into VACM.

I have no clue what you are trying to convey here - the ISMS charter is
pretty clear in saying that ISMS is not supposed to touch access control

issues. Perhaps you just wanted to say that NetConf access control
should not be constrained by the way VACM works - something I do agree
with.

/js

-- 
Juergen Schoenwaelder		    International University Bremen
<http://www.eecs.iu-bremen.de/>	    P.O. Box 750 561, 28725 Bremen,
Germany


--
to unsubscribe send a message to netconf-request@ops.ietf.org with
the word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body.
archive: <http://ops.ietf.org/lists/netconf/>