[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Scalability of Netconf

To: "Kenneth V. Crozier" <kcrozier@cisco.com>
Subject: Re: Scalability of Netconf
From: Juergen Schoenwaelder <j.schoenwaelder@iu-bremen.de>
Date: Sat, 2 Jul 2005 06:05:35 +0200
Cc: netconf@ops.ietf.org
In-reply-to: <42C587C0.1080201@cisco.com>
Mail-followup-to: "Kenneth V. Crozier" <kcrozier@cisco.com>, netconf@ops.ietf.org
References: <E1Do7r8-0002Q8-M5@newodin.ietf.org> <42C587C0.1080201@cisco.com>
Reply-to: j.schoenwaelder@iu-bremen.de
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.8i

On Fri, Jul 01, 2005 at 11:13:20AM -0700, Kenneth V. Crozier wrote:

> What i'm concerned with is how many connections a NM station would have 
> to maintain, and by this are we raising the bar for storage and 
> processor requirements of the NM station.

If I buy a machine for say 1.000 Euros and put Linux or BSD on it. What
do you think how many TCP connections I can maintain with such a box?

/js

-- 
Juergen Schoenwaelder		    International University Bremen
<http://www.eecs.iu-bremen.de/>	    P.O. Box 750 561, 28725 Bremen, Germany

--
to unsubscribe send a message to netconf-request@ops.ietf.org with
the word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body.
archive: <http://ops.ietf.org/lists/netconf/>

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Scalability of Netconf
  - From: Juergen Schoenwaelder <j.schoenwaelder@iu-bremen.de>

References:
- I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-netconf-prot-07.txt
  - From: Internet-Drafts@ietf.org
- Scalability of Netconf
  - From: "Kenneth V. Crozier" <kcrozier@cisco.com>

Prev by Date: Re: NETCONF interop event in Paris
Next by Date: Re: Scalability of Netconf
Previous by thread: Scalability of Netconf
Next by thread: Re: Scalability of Netconf
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread